Arnold Redux: Arnold Classics and the Remake Conundrum

4 Comments

“My name is Conan…but that’s another story…”

Before anything else is said, let’s admit it: Arnold Schwarzenegger is not a great thespian.  He tries, he REALLY does, but unfortunately the “Real” Arnold leaks into the “Movie” Arnold.  But Arnold’s acting career is not what is at point here (but it is on my next article).  This is about “remaking” or “re-envisioning” his films and the problems/successes that have come of it.  The title is no joke, when you try to mess with something Arnold built, it is indeed a conundrum!  Let’s get to the first, 2009′s “Terminator: Salvation”!


Terminator: Salvation (2009)

Even though this movie is a reboot of sorts, it’s “Terminator”…we HAVE to have Arnold in it somehow!  So what happened, they paste Arnold’s head on a body double to have the epic final battle to end the film.  Problem is, it looked SILLY!  The film in and of itself, isn’t horrible, and has some genuinely good ideas that add to the mythos of the “Terminator” franchise. Plus the film had some really good (bordering on great) performances in it, Sam Worthington and Anton Yelchin are definitely of note in this category.  Critically panned and commercially “OK”, “T4″ could have been much, much worse.  The problem with this film is just because of the title, it felt the need to have Arnold in there, it didn’t, at least not how they did it.

“Who are you?”

“I’m you….from the FUTURE!


Conan The Barbarian (2011)

As I have stated, Arnold isn’t the greatest actor, but sometimes you can’t separate the man from the role.  Conan is definitely that role, after both films, “Barbarian” and “Destroyer”, you really can’t see anyone else as Conan.  Enter 2011′s “Conan The Barbarian”:  The film itself is a pretty consistent and by-the-numbers Conan story (it beat the hell out of 1984′s “Conan: the Destroyer”).  But as much as I thought the film was above-average, Jason Momoa just wasn’t Conan.  Arnold was a very stoic and SILENT Conan, Momoa couldn’t keep his damn mouth shut, and ultimately, it took me out of the film.  I’m not saying NO ONE other than Arnold can be Conan…but they are rather large boots to fill.

“YOU???? WHO IN CROM’S NAME ARE YOU???”

“I am Conan of Cimmera, I am hunting my father’s killer and I will split the mountains to find him and send him to…..” SHUT UP ALREADY!


Total Recall (2012)

Probably the more infamous and notable to these remakes, “Total Recall” is honestly closer to the source material than Arnold’s 1990 version.  PLUS, Douglas Quaid is supposed to be a normal everyman, which Arnold is incapable of doing.  This film failed critically and financially, and I think was unfairly treated by critics and audiences.  If I could take Paul Verhoven’s style with the cast and technology of the 2012 version, it would be almost a perfect flick.  BUT there is one thing the 2012 is absolutely guilty of…WHERE IN THE BLUE HELL IS RICHTER???? They combine Lori and Richter into one character…*BANGS HEAD ON DESK!* that is really the cardinal sin that the remake committed, but overall it is the superior film (when it comes to the source material).

“If I’m not me…”

“…then who in the hell am I?”


Arnold Schwarzenegger is one of the greatest personalities of the 20th Century.  But his films aren’t untouchable relics of the past that should go untouched.  I do think Hollywood needs to lay off the remakes/reboots and get some original ideas flowing again, but every once in a while, show a new version of an old classic, just don’t remake “The 6th Day”….please god no.

Author: Lazz82

Random Spewer of Useless Knowledge is my official title. Connoisseur of films, music and video games. Throwing some knowledge your way!
  • Debo4735

    I think the movie Looper is a new idea for a movie.

    • Lazz82

      Indeed that and “Inception” are noteworthy examples of original ideas Hollywood needs to keep flowing… : )

  • Irons

    Why not remake the 6th Day ? If it’s broken, fix it. People are so confused about remakes. If a good film gets remade they scream “oh no why remake it it’s already good”, but if a bad film is remade, then they scream “oh no it’s a bad film why remake it”….

    • Lazz82

      Because “The 6th Day” was a terrible film, it’s plot was constructed of several established plot pieces and the film falls apart in the 3rd act…although you can fix continuity and plot problems…
      you can’t really remake “The 6th Day” without making an all new unrecognizable film and slapping “The 6th Day” on it