Comments on: Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull (2008) Movie Review

By: Jake

Jake — Mon, 17 Nov 2008 07:08:52 +0000

I agree with most everyone here. This movie was horrible. There is no way Indy would’ve survived that fall in the refrigerator (believe it or not hiding in a fridge during a nuclear blast could save your life IF you’re not thrown a thousand yards). The waterfall scene was just absolutely ridiculous. I even tried to move past that scene but I just couldn’t. I felt like they actually think we’ll be dumb enough to believe something like that is remotely possible. And wasn’t that a shot of Angel Falls (the last water fall) WTF?!

But, perhaps the worst scene of all was when Mutt went swinging through the jungle on the vines with the monkeys. For a few seconds I seriously thought I would see the words “Just kidding” pop up on the screen and the real movie would be shown. But surely no prankster would let a joke run that long? WRONG.

I felt this movie was an insult to my intelligence. How stupid must someone be to where their mind will allow them to suspend disbelief for this film? Let me give you an idea. I have a retarded friend. Even she felt insulted by the waterfall scene.

I think maybe that I have lost a few IQ points after watching this movie. Perhaps it’s part of a govt. conspiracy to dumb down the masses and turn us into mindless sheep. Oh wait…

By: YoYo

YoYo — Tue, 27 May 2008 16:59:50 +0000

….AND the one point where they really could have gone to town with the CGI was when one of the characters was zapped at the end. It was just a lame “burn up” nothing like the good ol’ melting face.

By: YoYo

YoYo — Tue, 27 May 2008 16:57:59 +0000

The review was right on. Lame story aside, i can’t tell you disappointed I was with the CGI. It was like they shot the whole thing in a studio. I was bored during the car chase seen. Why couldn’t they have set up a rig, drive it down a track, and have stunt men do the sword fight and then speed up the film. Great idea, but it just looked fake. Nothing compared to the Raiders truck convoy seen.

I really don’t get it. Cost couldn’t be an issue. Don’t these guys realize that anytime I can tell it is CGI means it sucks?

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 26 May 2008 14:22:38 +0000

After reading all the above reviews I want to say thank you guys for what you had to say. I watched this whole movie without throwing anything at the screen or cussing in front of the kids in the theatre, and was so happy when it ended. They started rolling the credits and I was sure no one would clap or cheer because of how terrible this was, but to my surprise everyone did! So its good to know that there are people that don’t always buy into the hype of a so called “good” movie and that you guys agree with me in thinking that it was garbage.

By: cherry K

cherry K — Sun, 25 May 2008 11:07:14 +0000

Oh yes you can say that again – Indy 4 is about as boring as a lame horse on sea weed. And for heaven’s sake give us a new spin will ya? I mean Area 51, Mayan civilization, alien ship, egg head creatures with bulbous eyes (looks like they took that straight out from the props of Close Encounters)you can find references of all of this from Eric Von Daniken’s Chariots of the Gods. It even looks like Georgie and Stevie studied that text back to front and even took out a page or two from the Roswell files, not to mention the biggest rip off from a 1993 movie/story – Tommyknockers by Stephen King. This story shares the same premise of alien ship buried underneath a townwhere the beings actually do ‘mind reads’, in other words, ‘telepathetic mumbo-jumbo’ that finds a new avatar in this movie. Man, no offence meant to the genius giantismo of SS and GL, but even National Treasure, its archeologically themed, moderately successful cine sibling does a better job of the action and humour in pace. About time someone cracked that whip and it ain’t gonna be Indy!

By: Me

Me — Fri, 23 May 2008 19:45:13 +0000

Another swing and a miss for these jokers. I wish Spielberg and Lucas would stop dreaming up lousy projects at their slumber parties. IJ4 is full of CGI, it gives the film a cartoony feel and takes you out of the moment. I’m a huge fan of Shia, but he seemed miscast and, at times, completely out of sorts. Ford needed a stunt double every time he got out of a chair, and what’s with the animals?? I tell everyone that asks to wait for cable and, even then, only if Sopranos reruns aren’t on somewhere (yeah I said it).

By: Patrick

Patrick — Fri, 23 May 2008 17:51:13 +0000

Adam aka Luigi is dead on.

This movie was garbage. Lucas needs to stop. No more directing or writing. Stop with CGI… just stop. Patton Oswalt had a very good tangent on the subject re: Lucas & Star Wars. That’s about where I stand.

Spielberg always produces quality, but whether it’s a good movie or not is a 50-50 chance.

Besides all of the above said by Luigi / Adam, which again, is 100% accurate, he left out that every scene involving Ford was with him sitting, lying down, or being thrown at his enemies. His age, while joked at, was seriously hindering the project. They were 10 years too late on this one.

Oh, and an attention-to-detail issue I had- Indie had two pictures of his father (Connery) and his friend Marcus on his desk. But no attempt was made to make these look like real pictures from a 1950s type camera or even how a normal photograph would look. They were blatant screen captures from Last Crusade. Very B-movie-esque BS, which is really beyond me how Spielberg would let slide.

So while very harsh, the above review was spot on. Hollywood has no soul, and will sell their sister for a dollar. Case in point- Indiana Jones 4.

By: Taylor

Taylor — Thu, 22 May 2008 19:13:54 +0000

There was indeed a lot more CGI than I thought there would be, considering, as Dustin mentioned, what Spielberg has said about that issue. However, I didn’t think the quality of the CGI was that bad.

In general, though, I didn’t much care for the movie. I never felt the sense of fun, adventure, or discovery that made the other Indy movies so enjoyable (despite their flaws). This is not a triumphant return, there is no “Yeah! Indiana Jones is back!” moment. There’s not even a grand statement of the “Raider’s March” from John Williams. The general storyline is acceptable and at times interesting, but the script is weak, especially when it comes to dialogue and, again, in making the viewer feel a sense of discovery and/or excitement as Indy puts together the clues.

Plus, Indy hardly uses his whip.

I hope there will be another review. This one seems very rushed.

By: dustin

dustin — Thu, 22 May 2008 18:51:49 +0000

The movie gets 80% certified fresh at Rotten Tomatoes? Count this review doubley discounted.

Hey random guy on the street who probably doesn’t even like the original Indiana Jones movies (or at least he did like them years ago but since then he has become a mal-content film hater) What did you think of the new one?

“Too many cutesy cut away shots of critters”

Wow-That sound like a completely vailid criticism and clearly you are someone who’s opinion should be adhered to. Thank you for helping me dodge this bullet.

By: dustin

dustin — Thu, 22 May 2008 18:27:07 +0000

This review smacks of the kind jaded cynicism that has more to say about the reviewer than the film.

Immediately discounted.

p.s.I haven’t seen the film yet but I thought the CGI was supposed to have been kept to a minimum. That was the whole point. Speilberg said he only used it to replace matt paintings and to erase the cables on the stunt work.