Introducing The Real Cloverfield Monster…
Cloverfield (2008) Movie — By Nix on January 19, 2008
Most of you have probably already seen the “Cloverfield” monster by now, since the film opened yesterday, but for those of you who still haven’t and are dying to know what it looks like, someone with a camera phone shot video of the monster and posted it online. As always, this qualifies as a CLOVERFIELD SPOILER, so you shouldn’t continue on if you don’t want to see what the Cloverfield monster looks like. It ain’t pretty.
Here it is (via):
Digg It
Stumble It
Tweet It
delicious
RSS
71 Comments
Hope you don’t get motion sickness. The Camera bouces around alot.
Lots of blood. I was suprised it was only pg-13 , I thought I was watching a rated R movie.
This is the part at the end, seconds before the camera dude gets eaten.
wait i just saw the movie and there was the giant monster and then there was it’s little baby things, and if im not mistaken that picture is one of the Mini monsters isn’t it? The big one looked different…
The monster(s) is/are definitley from the earth. The object seen falling from the sky into the ocean is a piece of satellite from the fictional company that produces Slusho. This piece of satellite is said to have awakened the monster(s) which have also been speculated to be the founder of slusho! who drank excessive amounts of Slusho! and has now been mutated due to the secret ingredient found in Slusho! harvested from the depths of the ocean. It is also a potential theory that the monster is actually multiple monsters attacking the city due to variations in the monsters appearance (3 claws vs 5 claws) and location issues as to how the monster could be in multiple locations so fast (The best example of this theory would be when they are on the bridge and it is attacked and destruction is still occurring in mid-town manhattan.
Dude THAT MONSTER IS BEAST HE COULD KICK GODZILLA’S ASS ANYWAY OF THE WEEK
is that really it? what is it a praymantis
I am mad!!!!I grew up on science fiction movies…I even rent what I would call “c” rate movies from the video store, but I am still trying to figure out what I just paid good money to see in the movie Cloverfield. I would consider it amateur at best. I have not felt this ripped off since I rented some low budget 60’s film. And what does the title have to do with anything? Does anyone know?…I think they were trying to make a quick buck on this one….seriously….yes the new Star Trek movie trailer looks great…where can I get a refund for Cloverfield???
Yes this is one of the Cloverfield monsters, but there is also a much larger one with a longer snout, it is seen getting bombed on before the helicopter crashes.
OMG!!
this movie totally disappointed me.
I only spent $2 to see it at the movie theater.
and I still think it was a waste of money.
I don’t get where the monster came from.
Ugh that movie was so confusing and someone has no idea how to hold a camera. Even when they weren’t running, the camera was still all over the place. I know they wanted it to look real, but come on!! I’ve never heard it being so silent in a movie theater after the movie…
What!!!! i can’t believe this is the monster. It’s all bony and ugly and stuff. i was hoping for it to be like a reptile kind of alien kind of thing oh well i geuss i will just have 2c the movie to check out the other monsters