Is Shyamalan’s The Happening “a Terrible, Terrible Movie”?

The Happening (2008) Movie — By Nix on May 16, 2008 |

Yes, says not one, but two people who have managed to see a sneak peek at M. Night Shyamalan’s stab at climbing out of the pit known as “critically and commercially savaged”, aka post-”Lady in the Water” stinkiness. Unfortunately, while the trailers seem to strike that perfect balance of, “What the hell is going on here?” and “Geez, I kinda don’t really want to know, because I might not be able to handle it!!”, the first reviews for the film are not, well, good. In fact, they’re downright terrible. Really, really terrible, apparently.

The reviews were sent into Collider.com. Here’s an excerpt:

“The Happening” is a terrible, terrible movie. I mean, it’s bad on an epic scale. It’s so bad that I can’t possibly tell you how bad it is without understating the point or making it sound like I’m picking on the film. But let me stress: this is not pent-up Shyamalan aggression or a desire to see him fail. This is bad in a jaw-dropping “they can’t really be serious, can they?” kind of way. The closest comparison I can draw is to Neil LaBute’s “Wicker Man” and, like that film, the only consolation I can offer potential theater-goers is that you might want to see it just to be in on the ground floor when the film gets its ass handed back to it.

Yikes.

Here’s more about the plot:

Picture “The Birds” without any birds, and that should give you a good idea of what Shyamalan seems to be going for. Suddenly and for seemingly no reason a neuro-toxin is released in the Northeastern United States that causes people to murder themselves in terrible ways. The effect sweeps through different towns and everyone races to escape, unsure of what’s really going on. The lead, Mark Wahlberg, is a schoolteacher who is on the outs with wife Zooey Deschanel. They flee together with a few other strangers and try to figure out what has caused the deadly outbreak.

You can read the rest of the review — SPOILERS!! — at Collider.com. And yes, the reviewer does tell you what causes “the happening”. And it’s, well, it’s pretty funny. Not in a “haha” sort of way, but in a, “Are you effin’ kidding me, M. Night?” sort of way.

The Happening Movie

    8 Comments

  • Cece says:

    Just by the perview and the lame title i wont even see it

  • Scheherez says:

    Oh…boy…

    What has he done? Is this the NEW Uwe Boll? Can he NOT sink ANY lower? This is Dog-dung! Aliens, yeah…Misguided people, even…I can stomach that…but TREES?!?!? Oy…Gotta be careful of your new cactus, now!!!!

  • aqualung says:

    You said there are two people who have seen it and did not like it, yet you only quote from the one article which bashes the movie. That review itself is suspect as what he has described is from the original script. And he claims there is no score in the version he saw when the score was completed a few weeks back. It is a wonder how the internet enables the spread of opinions & claimed experiences so widely and so fast that people don’t even stop to think if it is true or fake.

  • Me says:

    My tree-based neurotoxin trumps your lousy review.

    I see dead… trees…

  • Marty says:

    Am I the only person that loved Lady In The Water??

    • Stu says:

      What can one say about Sixth Sense. It was brilliant and forced everyone to watch it again to see all the clues they missed.

      I liked Unbreakable, although the pace was a little slow at times. This one seemed to have mixed reviews, but I didn’t see how someone could completely bash it without pointing out some good parts.

      I found Signs to be a movie that captivated me from start to finish. I enjoyed the portrayal of one rural family’s experience of an appocolytical(probably mispelled) event.

      Wow, so now we get to the Village. Sorry, I thought it was a complete waste of time. The only other movie I saw in the theater which was worse was Blair Witch. Oh, and some cheap cheap Sci Fi movie in 1981 which I forget the name.

      With Lady in the Water, I was so hoping for redemption. But I had not read any reviews, so I had no prior warning that I would totally regret losing that evening of my life, devoting it to a pointless attempt by M Night to portray himself as mankinds savior.

      Now, I keep telling myself that I have watched a lot of bad appocolytic movies and felt, at the least, mildly entertained by them(I even enjoyed “A Boy and His Dog”). But the reviewers are pushing me quickly to the decision to not risk this one, but wait for DvD. The guys and I had planned on watching the midnight opening show for this movie tonight (June12), but we may have to rethink our plans at dinner before we embark on a potential trek to distaster.

  • Frank says:

    This movie was so terrible that I felt morally obligated to produce a parody. See it here:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx16epbyj9g

    It pretty much sums up all my thoughts on the film.

Leave a Reply

Latest News from our other Entertainment Sites: