<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Backwoods (2006) Movie Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/</link>
	<description>Hollywood, Indie, Asian, Foreign, Horror, and Genre Movie Reviews and News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:08:08 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Other</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-89544</link>
		<dc:creator>Other</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 00:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-89544</guid>
		<description>He did not shoot the girl and couldn&#039;t have.  He only had two cartridges when he took possession of the shotgun.  One ended up in rapist back at the cabin and the other in the dandy brother out the back door.  Two bros dead and no cartridges = empty gun.  He was out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He did not shoot the girl and couldn&#8217;t have.  He only had two cartridges when he took possession of the shotgun.  One ended up in rapist back at the cabin and the other in the dandy brother out the back door.  Two bros dead and no cartridges = empty gun.  He was out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-87290</link>
		<dc:creator>gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-87290</guid>
		<description>They did not shoot the girl. shes still turning the crank.  The owner of the house they were staying at said &quot;You understand? you understand?&quot;  I think he had taken the bullets out of the rifle to be safe.  And becaues he still pulled the trigger the mna had to take him to &quot;jail&quot; or wherever he took him (I cant remember name)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They did not shoot the girl. shes still turning the crank.  The owner of the house they were staying at said &#8220;You understand? you understand?&#8221;  I think he had taken the bullets out of the rifle to be safe.  And becaues he still pulled the trigger the mna had to take him to &#8220;jail&#8221; or wherever he took him (I cant remember name)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-83194</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 07:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-83194</guid>
		<description>(By the way, I mean Norman, not Paul.  I&#039;m terrible with names.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(By the way, I mean Norman, not Paul.  I&#8217;m terrible with names.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-83193</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2009 07:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-83193</guid>
		<description>Siggi,

While I grant to you that your understanding of the story is very astute, I have to question your basic powers of observation.  Watch the ending scene again.  He didn&#039;t shoot the girl.

1.  The lightning is a trick for the audience to make you think he shot, but he didn&#039;t.
2.  The man&#039;s expression clearly shows a kind of relief.
3.  Her eyes are still clearly moving as he tells her it will be alright
4.  Her right arm is still turning the crank on the musical toy
5.  Her hands are clearly moving just before they move to the car - and these last three are not just poor child acting.  Even a kid knows how to play dead, and considering the acting job that girl did throughout the rest of the movie, it&#039;s inconceivable that she would botch this.
6.  The expression on Paul&#039;s wife&#039;s face and the man clearly indicate that he didn&#039;t shoot, although the situation is very serious, they did not just witness him shoot a defenseless child.

Had he shot her I might agree with your assessment of the plot.  Given that he didn&#039;t, I would say that he simply took pity on her and recognized that nothing more should be done.

But what do I know.  I&#039;m just a brainwashed American plugged into The Machine feeding the New World Order run by European bankers...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siggi,</p>
<p>While I grant to you that your understanding of the story is very astute, I have to question your basic powers of observation.  Watch the ending scene again.  He didn&#8217;t shoot the girl.</p>
<p>1.  The lightning is a trick for the audience to make you think he shot, but he didn&#8217;t.<br />
2.  The man&#8217;s expression clearly shows a kind of relief.<br />
3.  Her eyes are still clearly moving as he tells her it will be alright<br />
4.  Her right arm is still turning the crank on the musical toy<br />
5.  Her hands are clearly moving just before they move to the car &#8211; and these last three are not just poor child acting.  Even a kid knows how to play dead, and considering the acting job that girl did throughout the rest of the movie, it&#8217;s inconceivable that she would botch this.<br />
6.  The expression on Paul&#8217;s wife&#8217;s face and the man clearly indicate that he didn&#8217;t shoot, although the situation is very serious, they did not just witness him shoot a defenseless child.</p>
<p>Had he shot her I might agree with your assessment of the plot.  Given that he didn&#8217;t, I would say that he simply took pity on her and recognized that nothing more should be done.</p>
<p>But what do I know.  I&#8217;m just a brainwashed American plugged into The Machine feeding the New World Order run by European bankers&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-76028</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 05:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-76028</guid>
		<description>Also as a side note: the name NEREA is a Basque variant of NERE, meaning &quot;mine.&quot; Thinking about it, it makes more sense that the main villain impregnated his daughter rather than his sister and then gave his grandgaughter/daughter the same name, emphasizing his ownership of the female offspring. He also refers the the child as &quot;mine&quot; several times in the film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also as a side note: the name NEREA is a Basque variant of NERE, meaning &#8220;mine.&#8221; Thinking about it, it makes more sense that the main villain impregnated his daughter rather than his sister and then gave his grandgaughter/daughter the same name, emphasizing his ownership of the female offspring. He also refers the the child as &#8220;mine&#8221; several times in the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-76027</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 04:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-76027</guid>
		<description>The older man (the leader of the group) is the feral child&#039;s father. He impregnated his sister, whose name is Nerea (the same name given to the child), either through rape or consensual sex, it really doesn&#039;t matter. The child is born with deformed hands and represents the evil committed by her father/uncle and mother (who may be dead). When the man is trying to explain the situation to Paul in the woods, he says that sometimes the righteous need to suffer for the actions of the sinners, indicating that the child is suffering in a Christlike fashion for the sins of the father. She is both righteous and innocent as a child, and a frightening and cursed reminder of the effects of evil. That is why she must be kept out of sight. Check out the story &quot;The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas&quot; by Ursula K.LeGuin; similar ideas are expressed. At the end, Norman shoots the child not because he snapped, but out of pity for her and also for her father - vile as he may be. Look at the expressions on their faces as the camera shifts from one man to the other and the way Norman deliberately and painfully lowers the gun. There has been enough suffering, and Norman does what he can to end it. the last lines where the villager asks Norman if he now understands the situation also demands that we attempt to understand how love and suffering are intermixed and not what we always imagine them to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The older man (the leader of the group) is the feral child&#8217;s father. He impregnated his sister, whose name is Nerea (the same name given to the child), either through rape or consensual sex, it really doesn&#8217;t matter. The child is born with deformed hands and represents the evil committed by her father/uncle and mother (who may be dead). When the man is trying to explain the situation to Paul in the woods, he says that sometimes the righteous need to suffer for the actions of the sinners, indicating that the child is suffering in a Christlike fashion for the sins of the father. She is both righteous and innocent as a child, and a frightening and cursed reminder of the effects of evil. That is why she must be kept out of sight. Check out the story &#8220;The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas&#8221; by Ursula K.LeGuin; similar ideas are expressed. At the end, Norman shoots the child not because he snapped, but out of pity for her and also for her father &#8211; vile as he may be. Look at the expressions on their faces as the camera shifts from one man to the other and the way Norman deliberately and painfully lowers the gun. There has been enough suffering, and Norman does what he can to end it. the last lines where the villager asks Norman if he now understands the situation also demands that we attempt to understand how love and suffering are intermixed and not what we always imagine them to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sandra robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-74319</link>
		<dc:creator>sandra robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-74319</guid>
		<description>I think that the leader of the group was her father and that
he had impregnated his sister and when the baby was born, the
shame of it and the fact that the baby was deformed, the
father locked her away in the farmhouse but kept her alive
because as you see in the last scene, he loved her and she
loved him..and called him Papa.

I hated the film basically, the women really annoyed me, and
Paddy Considine who is considered a great actor really was
such a wimp...there was a lot of unhappiness and moaning and
groaning.  Gary Oldman as usual was wonderful, but his character
was annoying as well, so arrogant.  The rape scene was really
well done, scary Peckinpah style, the film reminded me a lot
of Deliverance, with a bunch of middle class men out in the 
woods with the loony locals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the leader of the group was her father and that<br />
he had impregnated his sister and when the baby was born, the<br />
shame of it and the fact that the baby was deformed, the<br />
father locked her away in the farmhouse but kept her alive<br />
because as you see in the last scene, he loved her and she<br />
loved him..and called him Papa.</p>
<p>I hated the film basically, the women really annoyed me, and<br />
Paddy Considine who is considered a great actor really was<br />
such a wimp&#8230;there was a lot of unhappiness and moaning and<br />
groaning.  Gary Oldman as usual was wonderful, but his character<br />
was annoying as well, so arrogant.  The rape scene was really<br />
well done, scary Peckinpah style, the film reminded me a lot<br />
of Deliverance, with a bunch of middle class men out in the<br />
woods with the loony locals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siggi</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-72134</link>
		<dc:creator>Siggi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 22:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-72134</guid>
		<description>That man at the end was either the girl&#039;s uncle or father.  At any rate, one of the brothers was the father.  Her deformity was obviously from incest.  That is why she was kept hidden away.  The sister was either raped by the rapist, or more likely, gave in to consentual sex with the older, most sophisticated brother who held her at the end.  As for why she was shot, that is less clear.  The man who shot her was already grieving over the loss of a child.  He snapped when he realized that she was the product of incest.  Most likely, his wife had a miscarriage and that is what strained the relationship.  So when he saw that a girl like that could be brought into the world and he could not hold together his relationship because of a lost child, despite his efforts, he shot the &quot;abomination&quot; who symbolized his own failure because she was born despite the odds.  She was a wasted desecration of fertility that he could not attain in &quot;decent relations&quot; with his bitter wife.  Her ultimate rejection in the bedroom at the end pushed him over the edge.  

This film, while flawed, is a refreshing escape from formulaic Hollywood pap that is so stiflingly pervasive these days.  But the fact that none of you film buffs could figure it out is just a testament as to why Hollywood does not take chances.  American audiences are simply not very sophisticated because very few people actually bother to read good literature, plays, or screen plays anymore.  It&#039;s a sad state of affairs and Hollywood is partly to blame, along with the other mass media dumbed-down news outlets, etc.  Americans are not genetically stupid.  We are just being systematically dumbed down by our environment in a country that denigrates intellectualism and scorns what it does not understand.  Bush is the epitomy of this trend.  We elected a dunce to rule us because we were conditioned to be cash cows by corporate interests and the ruling elite that want to use our prowess and economic muscle to start a New World Order.  Ironically, most of these &quot;master mind&quot; bankers in power are Europeans, themselves.  They tried their bid for power and failed under the NAZIs and now they have nearly achieved success with us (courtesy of our Federal Reserve, which they own and use to control Washington DC).  Unfortunately, we are the future of the planetary population as a whole: dull, self-absorbed, and addicted to immediate pay-offs and pleasures.  In short: tuned out to life&#039;s true pleasures--such as good conversation for the sake of conversation, philosophy, literature, a religious belief system that is founded on a higher form of love or selfless nonjudgmental devotion to a higher source of Universal Intelligence, etc.--and instead we find ourselves plugged in to what Pink Floyd so aptly calls, &quot;The Machine.&quot;  I am no exception.  Last night I watched Gladiators and completely enjoyed watching buff Amazonian women launch themselves at each other 40 feet in the air with their spandexed crotches pointed at the camera.  

And that was hard to confess.  Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That man at the end was either the girl&#8217;s uncle or father.  At any rate, one of the brothers was the father.  Her deformity was obviously from incest.  That is why she was kept hidden away.  The sister was either raped by the rapist, or more likely, gave in to consentual sex with the older, most sophisticated brother who held her at the end.  As for why she was shot, that is less clear.  The man who shot her was already grieving over the loss of a child.  He snapped when he realized that she was the product of incest.  Most likely, his wife had a miscarriage and that is what strained the relationship.  So when he saw that a girl like that could be brought into the world and he could not hold together his relationship because of a lost child, despite his efforts, he shot the &#8220;abomination&#8221; who symbolized his own failure because she was born despite the odds.  She was a wasted desecration of fertility that he could not attain in &#8220;decent relations&#8221; with his bitter wife.  Her ultimate rejection in the bedroom at the end pushed him over the edge.  </p>
<p>This film, while flawed, is a refreshing escape from formulaic Hollywood pap that is so stiflingly pervasive these days.  But the fact that none of you film buffs could figure it out is just a testament as to why Hollywood does not take chances.  American audiences are simply not very sophisticated because very few people actually bother to read good literature, plays, or screen plays anymore.  It&#8217;s a sad state of affairs and Hollywood is partly to blame, along with the other mass media dumbed-down news outlets, etc.  Americans are not genetically stupid.  We are just being systematically dumbed down by our environment in a country that denigrates intellectualism and scorns what it does not understand.  Bush is the epitomy of this trend.  We elected a dunce to rule us because we were conditioned to be cash cows by corporate interests and the ruling elite that want to use our prowess and economic muscle to start a New World Order.  Ironically, most of these &#8220;master mind&#8221; bankers in power are Europeans, themselves.  They tried their bid for power and failed under the NAZIs and now they have nearly achieved success with us (courtesy of our Federal Reserve, which they own and use to control Washington DC).  Unfortunately, we are the future of the planetary population as a whole: dull, self-absorbed, and addicted to immediate pay-offs and pleasures.  In short: tuned out to life&#8217;s true pleasures&#8211;such as good conversation for the sake of conversation, philosophy, literature, a religious belief system that is founded on a higher form of love or selfless nonjudgmental devotion to a higher source of Universal Intelligence, etc.&#8211;and instead we find ourselves plugged in to what Pink Floyd so aptly calls, &#8220;The Machine.&#8221;  I am no exception.  Last night I watched Gladiators and completely enjoyed watching buff Amazonian women launch themselves at each other 40 feet in the air with their spandexed crotches pointed at the camera.  </p>
<p>And that was hard to confess.  Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brian</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-71881</link>
		<dc:creator>brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 04:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-71881</guid>
		<description>I saw a speculation on another posting, which I think is correct, that suggested the main &quot;bad&quot; guy was actually the girl&#039;s father via one of his daughters.  One of his sons (?) who was accompanying him in the woods let slip that the mother was one their sisters.  The incest would explain both the deformity as well as give a stronger reason as to why she was hidden away in secrret.

Question...what did Paddy say at the very end of the movie to his wife as he walked toward the car?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a speculation on another posting, which I think is correct, that suggested the main &#8220;bad&#8221; guy was actually the girl&#8217;s father via one of his daughters.  One of his sons (?) who was accompanying him in the woods let slip that the mother was one their sisters.  The incest would explain both the deformity as well as give a stronger reason as to why she was hidden away in secrret.</p>
<p>Question&#8230;what did Paddy say at the very end of the movie to his wife as he walked toward the car?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martin</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-71101</link>
		<dc:creator>martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 18:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-71101</guid>
		<description>It was common in some countries and in oldertimes to hide away the abnormals of the family.  Think Fannie and Alexander where the homosexual relative is locked away in a secret room.  I believe this was the reason why the girl was locked away.  Notice her hand.  She was deformed.  Yes, the older man was her uncle.  I think it was a very good movie because it didn&#039;t spoon feed you everything.  But if one was astute, then it was easy to get.  What I didn&#039;t like was how Gary Oldman just gave up and let the old man execute him.  That was the only vague point for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was common in some countries and in oldertimes to hide away the abnormals of the family.  Think Fannie and Alexander where the homosexual relative is locked away in a secret room.  I believe this was the reason why the girl was locked away.  Notice her hand.  She was deformed.  Yes, the older man was her uncle.  I think it was a very good movie because it didn&#8217;t spoon feed you everything.  But if one was astute, then it was easy to get.  What I didn&#8217;t like was how Gary Oldman just gave up and let the old man execute him.  That was the only vague point for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Holcomb</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-70983</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Holcomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-70983</guid>
		<description>Phil,

That&#039;s a great point. I also felt that there was a bigger secret with the girl&#039;s feral nature. The werewolf angle would&#039;ve been a surprise within this type of story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a great point. I also felt that there was a bigger secret with the girl&#8217;s feral nature. The werewolf angle would&#8217;ve been a surprise within this type of story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-70981</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 22:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-70981</guid>
		<description>I thought mid way thru it, it was going to be a werewolf flick, with the way the girl bayed (sp?) at the moon and the weirdness of the local group and how the old guy actually beat gary oldman&#039;s character up the hill to the meeting point?  It reminded me a bit of the movie, An American Werewolf in London, where the townsfolk seemed to be hiding something.  I think it would have worked much better as that...I was left feeling unfulfilled at the end...

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought mid way thru it, it was going to be a werewolf flick, with the way the girl bayed (sp?) at the moon and the weirdness of the local group and how the old guy actually beat gary oldman&#8217;s character up the hill to the meeting point?  It reminded me a bit of the movie, An American Werewolf in London, where the townsfolk seemed to be hiding something.  I think it would have worked much better as that&#8230;I was left feeling unfulfilled at the end&#8230;</p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Holcomb</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-70968</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Holcomb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 13:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-70968</guid>
		<description>Rebecca, 

The man at the end was her Uncle, I believe. Earlier in the film he says that his sister is the child&#039;s mother or something to that effect. The music box was what Gary Oldman heard when he was in the old barn the first time and found the hiding spot. It must be her toy. As to why they kept her hidden away, I can only guess that it was because she was born with the hand deformity and perhaps mental defects that would be considered threatening in this backwoods community. I can only guess because the movie was so vague about everything and not always in a good way as I pointed out in the review. It creates a disturbing bad dream quality but is also annoying as simple questions are ignored. Hope that helps a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebecca, </p>
<p>The man at the end was her Uncle, I believe. Earlier in the film he says that his sister is the child&#8217;s mother or something to that effect. The music box was what Gary Oldman heard when he was in the old barn the first time and found the hiding spot. It must be her toy. As to why they kept her hidden away, I can only guess that it was because she was born with the hand deformity and perhaps mental defects that would be considered threatening in this backwoods community. I can only guess because the movie was so vague about everything and not always in a good way as I pointed out in the review. It creates a disturbing bad dream quality but is also annoying as simple questions are ignored. Hope that helps a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondhollywood.com/the-backwoods-2006-movie-review/comment-page-1/#comment-70886</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.beyondhollywood.com/?p=12613#comment-70886</guid>
		<description>Please explain about the girl in &quot;The Backwoods.&quot;  Why did the villagers keep her hidden away?  And was she shot at the end on purpose?  Why?  I simply did not understand the whole plot....and the man that was holding her at the end....was he a relative?  Was that a music box he gave her????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please explain about the girl in &#8220;The Backwoods.&#8221;  Why did the villagers keep her hidden away?  And was she shot at the end on purpose?  Why?  I simply did not understand the whole plot&#8230;.and the man that was holding her at the end&#8230;.was he a relative?  Was that a music box he gave her????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
