The Eagle (2011) Movie Review

I frequently rant about how studios ruin otherwise promising action films by suppressing violence in order to garner a PG-13 rating and thus achieve a wider audience. A truly kickass movie will kickass despite a noticeable lack of blood and swearing, just look at “Live Free or Die Hard” (though we all know that would have been ever better with a little splatter and if John McLane’s signature “Yippie-ki-yay, mother fucker” hadn’t been concealed by background noise), but a movie like “The Eagle”, suffers irreparable damage in its quest for PG-13. This is the kind of movie that needs the freedom and wiggle room provided by an R rating. “The Eagle” would never have been a great movie, that’s a fact, but if the action had been handled appropriately, it could at least have been fun to watch. Instead, the action and violence are toothless. You can feel where the filmmakers reigned themselves in and pulled back, and the result is that “The Eagle” feels castrated. In trying to make a movie for everyone, they made a movie for no one.

“The Eagle” is a story about Roman conquest, and as you can imagine, there are some prominent battle sequences. Overall these scenes look like leftovers from the opening battle from “Gladiator”, except with all of the violence missing. You see swords swinging, but the film cuts away before the blades actually slice through anything, and then you’re on to the next Centurion about to hack into someone, and the same thing happens. There are no causal connections at all. It’s as if, in every moment, a handful of frames have been lost. You could watch these fights and say that with all of these armed attacks, you never see anyone get injured. Not only are there no consequences, but this approach also gives the film a jagged, uneven feel, that makes it jarring to watch. Action is the only thing that could have saved “The Eagle”, but for a movie marketed on the epic action movie platform (you can see direct lifts from “Gladiator”, “Braveheart”, and “Lord of the Rings”, among others), there is woefully little of it. The weakest parts of the film are the acting and the story, and those take up the vast majority of the nearly two-hour run time.
20 years ago, the Ninth Legion, along with their beloved standard (a golden eagle), marched into the Highlands of Scotland, never to be heard from again. The disappearance and the loss is a point of shame for Marcus Aquila (Channing Tatum), son of the leader of the Ninth. When he comes of age and earns his first command, he requests a posting in Britain, hoping to restore honor to his family name. In a battle with what can only be described as an overacting hippie warlock, Marcus is wounded, though he displayed great bravery in leading his men. His feats earn him accolades from Rome, but his injuries lead to an honorable discharge from the military. A career soldier, he quickly grows tired of lounging about in his uncle’s (Donald Sutherland) posh villa, and when a rumor about the Eagle surfaces, Marcus, with his Scottish slave Esca (Jamie Bell), who hates all things Roman but owes a blood debt to Marcus for saving his life, in tow, heads north past Hadrian’s Wall, a barrier that was erected after the disappearance of the Ninth and now serves as the de facto boundary of the known world. What follows is a little bit like “Apocalypse Now” lite. The unlikely friends journey into a hostile, nightmarish land, battle rogue warriors, encounter uncooperative villagers, and get taken in by the Seal People, who think that Esca is the master and Marcus the slave.

Channing Tatum was the best part of “The Dilemma”, in fact he’s the only good part of that movie, but he shouldn’t be allowed to carry an entire film. He’s pretty to look at, and his character is supposed to be young, but his delivery is leaden, his attempts to evoke emotion are laughable, his heavy-handed moralizing lacks any passion or fire, and he is so baby-faced that it is impossible to take him seriously as a battle hardened head of a Roman garrison. There are roles Tatum can handle, but a charismatic leader of men is simply not one of them at this stage of his career. Bell is decent as Esca, though his part mainly consists of scowling and hating Rome, but also being conflicted because he owes Marcus his life. When they become bros it only complicates things further. You’re supposed to wonder where Esca’s alliances lie, with the people he was taken from or with his promise to Marcus, and question which bond is stronger, but if you watched any of the trailers or TV spots, they all give that away, and with it goes any hope of tension. Things happen too easily in “The Eagle”. Marcus and Esca go from slave and master to pals over the span of a brief “becoming friends” montage, and then they go from trust to distrust back to trust with a snap of your fingers.
The interactions with the Seal People are something to behold. You get the feeling that you’re watching a classic Hollywood portrayal of Native American culture, like the filmmakers are trying to show something that they don’t really understand, so they simplify it and dumb it down to the point of insulting caricature. The Seal People are uni-dimensional, drunken, child murdering savages, who have giant bonfire dances that are eerily reminiscent of that primal rave scene from the “Matrix” sequel. According to “The Eagle” that’s all there is to their culture. You know that somewhere, someone is trying to make a point about imperialism, occupation, and resistance that is supposed to resonate given the current state of the world, but nothing of the sort happens, and you’re left feeling almost offended at the pointlessness.

“The Eagle” isn’t as brutal as it needs to be to succeed, or even make the story believable, which is saying something for a movie where there are headless corpses hanging upside down from trees, and a child gets his throat slit. The film wants to be violent, and on the surface it is, but it is watered down to the point that even the sound of flesh being sliced is edited out, as if a knife tearing through skin makes no sound at all. More than any film in recent memory, “The Eagle” suffers from the attempts to tone down the violence for a desired rating. This action constrains the entire film, forcing it to rely on other elements, only nothing else is strong enough to prop up the entire movie, and “The Eagle” fails as a result.

Kevin Macdonald (director)/Jeremy Brock (writer)/Rosemary Sutcliff (novel)
CAST: Channing Tatum…Marcus Aquila
Jamie Bell…Esca
Donald Sutherland…Uncle Aquila
Tahar Rahim…The Seal Prince

Buy the eagle on DVD



About Brent McKnight

View all Posts

Brent McKnight lives in Seattle with his dogs. He likes beards, movies where things explode, and overcast skies. His three favorite movies are "Rubin and Ed", "A Bittersweet Life", and "Out for Justice". He wishes his knees didn't hurt. On Twitter @BrentMMcKnight

Cool Stories From Zergnet

  • http://www.originalgeekspodcast.com/ Dedpool

    So see “Centurion” instead huh?

    • http://www.beyondhollywood.com/ Nix

      If you want splatter? Yes. Neil Marshall and splatter go together like peanut butter and jelly.

      • http://www.originalgeekspodcast.com/ Dedpool

        Mmmm peanut butter and jelly. LOL.

        • Brent

          Mmm, peanut butter and splatter.

    • http://www.beyondhollywood.com/ Nix

      If you want splatter? Yes. Neil Marshall and splatter go together like peanut butter and jelly.

    • Brian

      I really enjoyed Centurion. I was surprised at how enjoyable it was.

  • 12345

    There’s more to life than blood and guts :/ I liked this movie, it was a cool adventure into an almost classic redemption story, but the setting and time period is one that you don’t see explored that often. But whatever Mr. Critic, i guess its your job to sound intelligent and tell the rest of us what to think…

  • SittingMooseShaman

    … jeeze, it seems the film community has forgotten that there is a huge ADULT audience out there- Who are approaching retirement- Not puberty.
    This is why I refuse to watch these crummy, watered-down & gully washing
    ‘Politically Clod-wretch’t’, immature, pseudo-Puritan, “Party”-pleasing, blather…
    Bosh!
    Bubblegum chewing, KiddyKorner rot!!

    I demand mature-audience cerebral action-packers which do not hold back on the “reality.”
    Actually, mature-audience… anything on film.
    Screw that “Village” sop!

  • SittingMooseShaman

    … jeeze, it seems the film community has forgotten that there is a huge ADULT audience out there- Who are approaching retirement- Not puberty.
    This is why I refuse to watch these crummy, watered-down & gully washing
    ‘Politically Clod-wretch’t’, immature, pseudo-Puritan, “Party”-pleasing, blather…
    Bosh!
    Bubblegum chewing, KiddyKorner rot!!

    I demand mature-audience cerebral action-packers which do not hold back on the “reality.”
    Actually, mature-audience… anything on film.
    Screw that “Village” sop!

  • http://twitter.com/DuncanMitchel1 Duncan Mitchel

    I’m about halfway through, and enjoying it more than I expected. On the other hand, I’m watching the unrated DVD version, which is evidently more violent than the PG-13 and puts in many of the things you missed from it. The level of violence feels about right to me.

    That’ being said, I am tired of ultraviolent cartoons – like “A Bittersweet Life,” for instance — which are not “mature” but pander to boy-culture. “A Bittersweet Life” is slightly better than most, because the director is so intelligent, but it was still tiresome. I’m not opposed to violence in films, necessarily. Ever seen “Peppermint Candy”? Or “Save the Green Planet”? I love both of them. But movies which lay on the exploding heads and blood fountains just for the sake of giving fanboys something to jerk off to leave me cold. “Dewd, that’s sick!” “Yeah, back up and let’s watch it again!”

    I’ll agree that “The Eagle” isn’t a great film, but it is better than most reviews led to me expect. So far, anyway.

    Oh, and by the way. It’s “reined in”, not “reigned in.”