The New Battlefield 3 Game is so Real You Might Pee Your Pants

6 Comments

Battlefield 3 Game

Okay, so maybe you won’t pee your pants because it’s so realistic, but according to this latest trailer for “Battlefield 3″, the gameplay in “Battlefield 3″ is so friggin’ real you won’t be able to tell it apart from a real-life combat situation. Mostly. Yeah, that’s pushing it a bit, but you gotta admit, it is pretty damn realistic looking. Easily the most realistic looking first-person shooter in a long time, that’s for damn sure. In terms of visual realness, the “Call of Duty” games ain’t got nothin’ on Electronic Arts. By the by, notice the tagline? “Above and Beyond The Call”? Hmm, I wonder what they’re trying to get at there. Can’t we all just get along?

Battlefield 3 is a First-Person Shooter (FPS) that is designed to attack your senses, delivering a visceral combat experience like no other FPS before it. Sequel to 2005’s Battlefield 2, Battlefield 3 utilizes the updated Frostbite 2 game engine, which allows for advanced destruction, sound, and graphics as well as a focus on dense in-game urban settings. Additional game features include: classic Battlefield mission-based gameplay, an impressive array of vehicles including jets and tanks, large-scale maps, an updated soldier class, 2-24 player support online and more.

“Battlefield 3″ frags stores everywhere this Tuesday on October 25, 2011.

Battlefield 3 Game PS3 Cover

Author: Nix

Editor/Writer at BeyondHollywood.com. Likes: long walks on the beach and Kevin Costner post-apocalyptic movies. Dislikes: 3D, shaky cam, and shaky cam in 3D. Got a site issue? Wanna submit Movie/TV news? Or to email me in regards to anything on the site, you can do so at nix (at) beyondhollywood.com.
  • http://www.grifiti.com Tin Hoang

    I can’t decide on Battlefield 3 or Modern Warfare 3. No way I’m getting both.

    • http://www.beyondhollywood.com/ Nix

      $60 a pop for a year’s worth of entertainment value? Sounds cheap to me. I spent $60 on God of War 3 and played for 1 week. Total. I have played Black Ops for an entire year. You can’t get that kind of extended longevity for $60 bucks anywhere else with anything.

      • http://www.grifiti.com Tin Hoang

        I’m lucky to be able to get one of them. So I have to choose wisely. Leaning toward Modern Warefare. Battlefield is more vehical based?

        • http://www.beyondhollywood.com/ Nix

          Not really, but there are vehicles. Basically, it’ll depend on your preference in terms of online multiplayer. The big difference is that Battlefield doesn’t have COD’s “prestige” leveling up gameplay. I know some people who love this (constantly achieving something, ranking up, etc can be addicting), and others who hate the repetitive nature of it. Battlefield 3’s graphics does look more realistic, but if all you want this for is the single player campaign, that’s where you should go. The COD games are notorious for their short campaign mode, because it’s basically all about the online multiplayer.

          • http://www.grifiti.com Tin Hoang

            Multiplayer is where the action is. It’ll be what keeps you coming back, right? I’m looking for a Counterstrike alternative. Now you got me leaning toward Battlefield 3. Not sure that repetitive nature of COD sounds good.

          • http://www.beyondhollywood.com/ Nix

            Yah, it’s pretty much up to personal preference. I kind of like the whole leveling up aspect of COD myself, gives me something to “achieve” when I sit down to play them to waste some hours.